Distance between two charges where field strength = 0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the point along the line connecting two charges, q1 = 0.500 nC and q2 = 9.00 nC, where the total electric field is zero. The participants derive the relationship between the distances from the charges and set up an equation based on the electric field formula. After several calculations and rearrangements, they apply the quadratic formula to solve for the distance, ultimately finding that the correct distance from the first charge is 0.38 m. The solution is confirmed as accurate, concluding the problem effectively.
TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Distance between two charges where field strength = 0

Homework Statement



Two particles having charges q1 = 0.500 nC and q2 = 9.00 nC are separated by a distance of 2.00 m.

At what point along the line connecting the two charges is the total electric field due to the two charges equal to zero?

Homework Equations



E = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0}\frac{q}{r^2}

I have reduced this two:

\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



putting in the variables:

\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{r_1^2} = \frac{9.0*10^{-9}}{r_2^2}

I can rearrang to get:

\frac{r_2^2}{r_1_2} = \frac{9.0*10^{-9}}{0.5*10^{-9}},

and:

\frac{r_2^2}{r_1_2} = 18

But I am not sure how to get the right distance to the actual point?

TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From this point,
TFM said:
\frac{q_1}{r_1^2} = \frac{q_2}{r_2^2}
let x be the distance from the first charge to the point where E=0 such that,

\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{(2-x)^2}

Do you follow?
 
That makes sense, so now:

\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{4-4x+x^2}

Rearranging:

\frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

And, inserting q1 and q2:

0.0556 = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

How does this look?

TFM
 
TFM said:
That makes sense, so now:

\frac{q_1}{x^2} = \frac{q_2}{4-4x+x^2}

Rearranging:

\frac{q_1}{q_2} = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

And, inserting q1 and q2:

0.0556 = \frac{x^2}{4-4x+x^2}

How does this look?

TFM
Looks good to me, although I would be tempted to leave the ratio of the charges as a fraction.
 
So:

\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{9*10^{-9}} = \frac{x^2}{4 - 4x + x^2}

Okay, so where should I go from here?

TFM
 
TFM said:
So:

\frac{0.5*10^{-9}}{9*10^{-9}} = \frac{x^2}{4 - 4x + x^2}

Okay, so where should I go from here?

TFM
How about multiplying through by the denominator of the RHS, then solving for x?
 
So:

(0.5*10^{-9})(4 - 4x + x^2) = 9 x 10^{-9}x^2

(2*10^{-9} - (2*10^{-9})x + (0.5*10^{-9})x^2 = 9*10^{-9}x^2

Doubling everything:

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (1*10^{-9})x^2 = 18*10^{-9}x^2

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (1*10^{-9})x^2 = 18*10^{-9}x^2

Taking everything over to the LHS:

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + ((1-18)*10^{-9})x^2 = 0

(4*10^{-9} - (4*10^{-9})x + (-17*10^{-9})x^2 = 0

Then using the formula:

x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}

where:

a = 4*10^{-9} , b = -4*10^{-9} , c = -17*10^{-9}

Giving:

x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{8*10^{-8}}

Which gives x as being either 2.62 (too big) or -1.62?

TFM
 
You're correct except for the bit where you start using the quadratic formula.

The quadratic formula as you have written it corresponds to:
ax^2 + bx + c = 0

However, you're equation is in the form:
c + bx + ax^2 = 0

(Which is obviously the same, but you are switching a and c!)
 
TFM said:
Giving:

x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{8*10^{-8}}

Which gives x as being either 2.62 (too big) or -1.62?

TFM

Thanks, Nick89, This should be:

x = \frac{4*10^{-9} \pm 1.697*10^{-8}}{2*-17*10^{-8}}

This gives -0.61 and 0.38, which look better

TFM
 
  • #10
I just tried putting in 0.38, an it is the correct answer :smile:

Thanks everybody,

TFM
 
Back
Top