I Distinguishable Terms in a State

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Swamp Thing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State Terms
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,028
Reaction score
767
Let's say we have a proposition (or state, if we prefer) ##P\equiv \psi \equiv AB^\perp + e^{j \theta} A^\perp B## where, e.g., ##A^{\perp}## indicates some ket that is orthogonal to ##A##.

We also have an operator ##\hat{O}## .

Without reference to a physical context, is there a test to say whether there will be interference in the probability of observing a given eigenvalue of ##\hat{O}## as we vary the phase ##\theta## ? In other words, how would a shut-up-and-calculate robot know whether it should sum-then-square or it should square-then-sum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We need to get a projection operator ##\hat\Pi## corresponding to a given eigenvalue of ##\hat O##. Then the probability is calculated as $$ <\psi|\hat\Pi|\psi>$$ If it changes when θ changes, then we have interference.
 
  • Like
Likes Swamp Thing
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
983
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
893
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top