Divergence and transversal extension integral definitions

AI Thread Summary
Gaussian beams exhibit minimal divergence and minimal transversal extension, characterized by specific integral definitions. The divergence is proportional to the variance of the spatial frequency spectrum |A(k_x, k_y)|^2, which indicates the distribution of plane wave components in relation to the beam's propagation direction. The transversal extension is similarly defined using the variance of the electric field amplitude |E|^2 in the spatial domain. Both concepts rely on calculating the mean square and mean values of their respective distributions, leading to insights about beam behavior. Understanding these definitions enhances comprehension of Gaussian beam properties in optics.
Gabriel Maia
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Hi. I am reading a paper about gaussian beams and the author says that gaussian beams have simultaneously minimal divergence and minimal transversal extension. In order to prove it, the author states that

\mathrm{divergenece} \propto \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\,k_{x}}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\,k_{y}}{2\pi} (k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2})|A(k_{x},k_{y})|^2

and

\mathrm{transversal \, extension} \propto \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\,x \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\,y (x^{2}+y^{2})|E|^2,

where

E = \int \frac{d\,k_{x}}{2\pi} \int \frac{d\,k_{y}}{2\pi} A(k_{x},k_{y}) \exp[i\,k_{x}\,x + i\,k_{y}\,y+i \, \sqrt{k^2-k_{x}^2-k_{y}^2} \, z]

is the electric field amplitude and A(k_{x},k_{y}) is the amplitude distribution.

I look it up and I couldn't find these integral definitions of divergence and transversal extension. Does anybody have a source on these? Or could at least give me an idea about how they came to be defined this way?

Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gabriel Maia said:
##\mathrm{divergenece} \propto \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\,k_{x}}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\,k_{y}}{2\pi} (k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2})|A(k_{x},k_{y})|^2##
The divergence of a beam of light is best characterized by the width of the spatial frequency spectrum ##|A(k_x,k_y)|^2##. The reason being the spatial frequency ##(k_x,k_y)## is proportional to the angle the corresponding plane wave component (a pair of spatial frequency coordinates ##(k_x,k_y)## describes a single plane wave component out of the plane wave bundle making up the beam) deviates from the beam's propagation direction. The wider ##|A(k_x,k_y)|^2## is, the more plane wave components propagating at larger angles are contained within that beam.

The particular equation you have there is actually the formula for the width of the spectrum in terms of its variance in a radial direction in ##(k_x,k_y)## plane, i.e. ##k^2=k_{x}^{2}+k_{y}^{2}##. Remember that if you have a continuous probability distribution ##P(x)## of a continuous variable ##x##, you can find its variance from the mean square and the mean value of ##P(x)## where the mean square is given by
$$
\langle x^2 \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^\infty x^2 P(x) dx
$$
,the mean is
$$
\langle x \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^\infty x P(x) dx.
$$
and the variance ##\sigma## is
$$
\sigma = \langle x^2 \rangle-\langle x \rangle^2
$$
In the equation of the Gaussian beam above, you take the analogy between ##P(x)## and ##|A(k_x,k_y)|^2## and use the above formula to calculate the mean square and the mean value of ##|A(k_x,k_y)|^2##. The mean value is zero because ##|A(k_x,k_y)|^2## is symmetric and centered about ##k_x=k_y=0## and hence the divergence, represented as the variance of ##|A(k_x,k_y)|^2## is equal to its mean square
$$
\langle k^2 \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\,k_{x}}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{d\,k_{y}}{2\pi} k^2|A(k_{x},k_{y})|^2
$$
Gabriel Maia said:
\mathrm{transversal \, extension} \propto \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\,x \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\,y (x^{2}+y^{2})|E|^2,
Exactly the same principle about calculating the variance like the one above, but this time applied to the beam in the position plane.
 
  • Like
Likes Gabriel Maia
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top