Divergence in cylindrical/spherical coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the divergence formula in spherical coordinates, specifically how to express the contribution from the faces of a small spherical volume. The key equation involves integrating the dot product of vector A with the differential area vector, leading to the divergence expression. The contribution from the radial faces is calculated, resulting in a specific form that relates to the divergence in spherical coordinates. A point of confusion arises regarding the transition to the standard form of the divergence expression, prompting a suggestion to work backward from the expression for clarity. Understanding this derivation is crucial for applying divergence in different coordinate systems.
deedsy
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm just having trouble understanding a step in my notes from class.. We're talking about how to derive the divergence in other coordinate systems.

Homework Equations



So, we are deriving this divergence formula in spherical coordinates

\oint \vec{A}\cdot d\vec{A} = \int (∇ \cdot \vec{A}) dv

The Attempt at a Solution



To do that, we create a small unit of spherical-like volume, and see it's contribution to \oint \vec{A}\cdot d\vec{A}. We'll need to do this for all 6 faces of this small volume...and added together, it will give us the divergence formula in spherical coordinates.

So, for our small volume we use in spherical coords, we found that the contribution from the \pm \hat{r} faces was [\frac{\partial A_r}{\partial r} + \frac{2 A_r}{r_0}] r_0^2 sin(\theta_0) dr d\theta d\phi ---> which is our \int (∇ \cdot \vec{A}) dv for these 2 faces

Now when you look at the r-component of the divergence in spherical coordinates online, you'll see this written as
(∇ \cdot \vec{A})_\hat{r} = \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial (r^2 A_r)}{\partial r}

In my notes, we did write it this way in the next step, but I guess I missed why you could re-write it that way. I'm thinking it should be easy (since it's just one step to get there)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try working it backward ie take the partial of r^2A sub r and what do you get?

The r^2sin(theta)drdthetadphi is the dv piece
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top