Divergence of integral over vacuum energies (Free field)

soviet1100
Messages
50
Reaction score
16
Hi,

The Hamiltonian for the free scalar field, expressed in terms of the creation/annihilation operators, is

H = \int d^{3}p [\omega_p a^{\dagger}_p a_p + \frac{1}{2}\omega_p \delta^{3}(0)] \hspace{3mm}

I thought: \omega_p is a function of p as \omega^{2}_p = |p|^{2} + m^2 and so the dirac delta will sift out the value of \omega_p at p = 0. Could someone tell me why this statement is incorrect? I think I've made some significant conceptual error. Is the first term divergent for infinite p as well?

P.S. wherever p appears above, it is to be taken as the 3-momentum
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you expect would happen if the Dirac delta was ## \delta^3(p) ##. But ## \delta^3(0) ## is simply equal to infinity, or more precisely, the volume of whole space, which is a constant.
 
  • Like
Likes soviet1100
Shyan said:
What you expect would happen if the Dirac delta was ## \delta^3(p) ##. But ## \delta^3(0) ## is simply equal to infinity, or more precisely, the volume of whole space, which is a constant.

Ah, of course. Thanks, that was silly of me.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top