Divergence of traceless matrix

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jouvelot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The divergence of the traceless part of the matrix \( M \) is directly proportional to the gradient of its trace, as established in the discussion. Specifically, the equation \( \partial /\partial \hat{n}_a (M_{ab} - \delta_{ab} \text{Tr}(M)/2) = \partial (\text{Tr}(M)/2)/\partial \hat{n}_b \) holds true under the assumption that \( \partial M_{ab}/\partial \hat{n}_c \) is symmetric in indices \( a, b, \) and \( c \). The trace of \( M \) is defined as \( M_{aa} \), and the symmetry leads to the conclusion that \( \frac{\partial M_{ab}}{\partial \hat{n}_a} = \frac{\partial M_{aa}}{\partial \hat{n}_b} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor calculus
  • Familiarity with matrix operations
  • Knowledge of divergence and gradient concepts
  • Basic principles of symmetry in mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric tensors in physics
  • Learn about divergence and gradient operations in tensor analysis
  • Explore applications of traceless matrices in continuum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of matrix traces in physical theories
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers who are working with tensor analysis, particularly in fields involving continuum mechanics and theoretical physics.

jouvelot
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
Assume that ##\partial M_{ab}/\partial \hat{n}_c## is completely symmetric in ##a, b## and ##c##. Then, it is stated in the book I read that the divergence of the traceless part of ##M## is proportional to the gradient of the trace of ##M##. More precisely,
$$ \partial /\partial \hat{n}_a (M_{ab} - \delta_{ab} {\rm Tr} (M)/2) = \partial ({\rm Tr} (M)/2)/\partial \hat{n}_b .$$ Can anyone provide some hints on why this is true, please?
Thanks in advance.
Pierre
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trace of M is M_{aa}. By symmetry, <br /> \frac{\partial M_{ab}}{\partial \hat{n}_a} = \frac{\partial M_{aa}}{\partial \hat{n}_b}<br />
 
Thanks. This was pretty simple; I should have gotten that ;)

Bye,

Pierre
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K