Division of Chi Squared Random Variables

jojay99
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I have a quick question. Suppose X is a chi squared random variable with n degrees of freedom and Y is another independent chi squared random variable with n degrees of freedom.

Is X/Y ~ 1 ?

Intuitively, it makes sense to me but I'm not too sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hey jojay99 and welcome to the forums.

If X != Y the answer is an emphatic no. You can't just assume that X = Y just because both have the same degree of freedom: if they are two distinct random variables then they will have some distribution.

The result you should look at is the derivation of the F-distribution:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-distribution

Any derivation of the F-distribution will tell you how the distribution for a ratio of chi-square distributions (with terms for the degrees which are constants) is derived.

Remember that if you have two distributions you need to check whether the two variables correspond to the same process and not the same variable definition or PDF.

Another thing to think about: is X + Y = 2X? How about X + Y = 2Y? Even if it's not a random variable, just think a normal variable and consider those questions.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top