DLVO interaction: Choice of Hamaker constants

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the appropriate Hamaker constants for calculating the interaction energy between two differently sized particles suspended in water with ions. The smaller particles are polystyrene orbs coated in protein, while the larger ones contain magnetite and are also protein-coated. There is uncertainty about whether to use the Hamaker constants for the polystyrene particles alone, include the protein layers, or factor in the magnetite's influence. The complexity of the particles suggests that the magnetite may significantly alter the absorption and polarizability, necessitating careful consideration in the calculations. References to works by Mahanty and Ninham, Parsegian, and Israelachvili are noted for further guidance on the formulas needed.
LucidWaker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For a project, I'm trying to describe the interaction energy between two particles suspended in water which contains ions. I seem to have the double layer effect worked out pretty well, but I'm having trouble with the Van der Waals contribution, or more specifically, with the choice of Hamaker constants to determine the total combined Hamaker constant of the system.

The two particles are of different sizes (micrometer range), the smaller ones are polystyrene orbs coated in protein, the bigger ones (approx. 10 times bigger) are protein coated polystyrene orbs containing magnetite particles. The two protein kinds are different, and compatible to engage in a bond.

What Hamaker constants of what material should I choose? Should I use a total combined Hamaker constant of two polystyrene particles in water, or should I consider the outer layer of the particles, the protein layer? Or maybe, the Hamaker constant of magnetite in one of the particles plays a role?

Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamaker constant, as presented in my book, is:

A = \frac{3\hbar}{2}\alpha_{1}(0)\alpha_{2}(0) \frac{\omega_{1}\omega_{2}}{\omega_{1}+\omega_{2}}

Where \alpha(0) is the static polarizability and \omega the frequency of principal absorption (?).

The references claimed to have complete formulaies for different shapes and spacings are books by Mahanty and Ninham, Parsegian, and Israelachvili.

Since you have rather complex particles, it's hard to say exactly what to use- if the magnetite changes the absorption and polarizability (which it likely does), then you need to deal with that. The protein coatings may only have a minor effect.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top