DLVO interaction: Choice of Hamaker constants

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the appropriate Hamaker constants for calculating the interaction energy between two differently sized particles suspended in water with ions. The smaller particles are polystyrene orbs coated in protein, while the larger ones contain magnetite and are also protein-coated. There is uncertainty about whether to use the Hamaker constants for the polystyrene particles alone, include the protein layers, or factor in the magnetite's influence. The complexity of the particles suggests that the magnetite may significantly alter the absorption and polarizability, necessitating careful consideration in the calculations. References to works by Mahanty and Ninham, Parsegian, and Israelachvili are noted for further guidance on the formulas needed.
LucidWaker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For a project, I'm trying to describe the interaction energy between two particles suspended in water which contains ions. I seem to have the double layer effect worked out pretty well, but I'm having trouble with the Van der Waals contribution, or more specifically, with the choice of Hamaker constants to determine the total combined Hamaker constant of the system.

The two particles are of different sizes (micrometer range), the smaller ones are polystyrene orbs coated in protein, the bigger ones (approx. 10 times bigger) are protein coated polystyrene orbs containing magnetite particles. The two protein kinds are different, and compatible to engage in a bond.

What Hamaker constants of what material should I choose? Should I use a total combined Hamaker constant of two polystyrene particles in water, or should I consider the outer layer of the particles, the protein layer? Or maybe, the Hamaker constant of magnetite in one of the particles plays a role?

Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamaker constant, as presented in my book, is:

A = \frac{3\hbar}{2}\alpha_{1}(0)\alpha_{2}(0) \frac{\omega_{1}\omega_{2}}{\omega_{1}+\omega_{2}}

Where \alpha(0) is the static polarizability and \omega the frequency of principal absorption (?).

The references claimed to have complete formulaies for different shapes and spacings are books by Mahanty and Ninham, Parsegian, and Israelachvili.

Since you have rather complex particles, it's hard to say exactly what to use- if the magnetite changes the absorption and polarizability (which it likely does), then you need to deal with that. The protein coatings may only have a minor effect.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 118 ·
4
Replies
118
Views
11K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K