Do 1/inf and 1000/inf have same limit of 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hassman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the limits of 1/N and 1000/N approach zero as N tends to infinity. Both expressions indeed have a limit of zero as N increases. However, the phrase "1/infinity" is criticized for being nonsensical in the context of real numbers, as arithmetic cannot be performed with infinity. The conclusion affirms that while both limits are zero, the terminology used in the question is misleading. The limits of 1/N and 1000/N are correctly stated to be zero as N approaches infinity.
hassman
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
The title says it all:

Do

\frac{1}{N} = and \frac{1000}{N} have limit of zero as N tends to infinity?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
ok :D ty
 
hassman said:
The title says it all:

Do

\frac{1}{N} = and \frac{1000}{N} have limit of zero as N tends to infinity?
No, the title does not say it all! the limit as N goes to infinity, of 1/N, is NOT the same as "1/infinity"! The latter simply makes no sense. You cannot do arithmetic with "infinity" in the real number system.

The answer to your question is "yes", however, those limits are both 0.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Back
Top