Do atomic clocks prove time dilation and length contraction?

phys-lexic
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
when using lorentz factor in time dilation and length contraction... are those phenomenon only considered when the velocity is comparable to the speed of light or does it happen all the time and extremely negligeable in all cases other than when v~c? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
effects usually seem noticeable at about .5c
 
phys-lexic said:
when using lorentz factor in time dilation and length contraction... are those phenomenon only considered when the velocity is comparable to the speed of light or does it happen all the time and extremely negligeable in all cases other than when v~c? thanks.

It happens all the time; it is just harder to measure with smaller velocities.

A classic experiment in 1971 involved flying atomic clocks around the world on regular aircraft flights. It's the Hafele and Keating Experiment. The consequences are calculated from a combination of general and special relativity. You need the general relativity because flying at altitude makes a difference. In any case, after clocks flying east-west, and clocks flying west-east, were all back home and compared again with a clock left at home, time dilation was able to be checked with these clocks.

The various contributions (from gravitation and velocity effects) were all of the order of magnitude 100 nano seconds; easily measured with the clocks. More details at the link.

If you've ever taken a long haul airflight, then you've experienced a different length of time from your folks at home, by an amount that is tiny but measurable with decent equipment.

Cheers -- Sylas
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top