Do both circuits have the same output waveform?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether two circuits with opposite battery polarities produce the same output waveform. It is established that the circuits will only behave identically if the battery voltage is zero; otherwise, the clipping voltage will vary based on the battery's voltage. The user calculates that for circuit #1, the diode will conduct at -5.3 volts, indicating that the output waveform will differ from circuit #2. The output waveform for circuit #1 will resemble the input waveform but will include a horizontal line at -5.3 volts. Clarification on drawing the output waveform for circuit #1 is requested, with guidance provided.
PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
72
Hi, :wink:

In the link given below circuit #1 and #2 are same except that they have opposite polarities for the battery V. On the left bottom there is output waveform after the clipping. In the beginning I was thinking that output for both circuits, #1 and #2, will be same. But now I am doubtful!:confused: The diode D1 starts conducting when its anode is more positive than cathode and there is potential difference across them of at least 0.7V. Let's assume the battery V is of 6 volts.

Link:--
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/716/changingpolarityofbatte.jpg

Do both circuits have the same output which is given on left bottom? Tell me please. Much grateful for any help you can give me.

Cheers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
No. Not the same unless battery is 0 volts.
 
As Antiphon says at a battery voltage of zero both circuits will behave the same. If however you apply a battery voltage to the cathode of the diode, the clipping voltage will change from the +0.7 V by the same amount as the battery voltage whether positive or negative
 
skeptic2 said:
As Antiphon says at a battery voltage of zero both circuits will behave the same. If however you apply a battery voltage to the cathode of the diode, the clipping voltage will change from the +0.7 V by the same amount as the battery voltage whether positive or negative

Many thanks Antiphon and skeptic2. :approve:

Okay. I think the output waveform I have drawn in the diagram on the below link is correct for only circuit #2. Approve it if you also find it not incorrect please.

Link: http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/716/changingpolarityofbatte.jpg

So I will focus on circuit #1. As I said in first post that let take the voltage of battery V 6 volts. Also take +Vp and -Vp equal to +10V and -10V respectively.

The cathode of the diode is at -6 volts (because -ve terminal of the battery V is next to it). For the diode to conduct there should be potential difference of at least 0.7V across the diode and anode should be more positive than cathode. This can be written as a equation: Anode Voltage minus Cathode Voltage = +0.7V.

Av - (-6) = 0.7
Av = -5.3V

So it means the diode will start conducting at -5.3 volts. It will not conduct between -5.3V > Vrb >= -10V. Vrb stands for the voltage when the diode would be reverse biased.

Here is diagram: http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/5811/voutforcircuit1.jpg

Is this all correct to this far?

If it is, I still don't understand how to draw a output waveform for this. Can you help me with output graph for circuit #1 please?

Cheers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your output waveform will be the same as the input waveform except that there should be a straight horizontal line at -5.3 V between the two points on the sine wave.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top