Do Fresnell equations apply to other waves than EM waves?

AI Thread Summary
Fresnel equations are fundamentally based on Maxwell's equations, which govern electromagnetic (EM) waves, indicating their primary applicability to EM phenomena. The discussion raises the question of whether similar principles, such as Brewster and critical angles, can be adapted for other types of waves, like sound waves in water. While some mechanical waves exhibit behaviors like half wave loss upon reflection, the specific polarization aspects of Fresnel equations do not directly translate to sound waves. The conversation also touches on the need for comprehensive modeling in sound wave propagation, suggesting an interest in exploring analogous equations. Ultimately, the consensus is that Fresnel equations are specific to EM waves, but there may be comparable behaviors in other wave types under certain conditions.
DragonPetter
Messages
830
Reaction score
1
When I read about Fresnel equations, I see that it is based on boundary equations determined by Maxwell's equations. So I would think these equations only apply to EM waves.

But is there a similar behavior in other waves like sound waves in water? Would I want to use or modify Fresnel equations for other waves than EM waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to guess that Fresnell equations is only specific to EM waves because it is using the parallel and perpendicular polarization which I think does not apply to sound waves
 
DragonPetter said:
When I read about Fresnel equations, I see that it is based on boundary equations determined by Maxwell's equations. So I would think these equations only apply to EM waves.

But is there a similar behavior in other waves like sound waves in water? Would I want to use or modify Fresnel equations for other waves than EM waves?

They only apply to electromagnetic waves.

What does "similar behavior" mean? Half wave loss? Then yes, mechanical waves have half wave loss when reflected on certain conditions too.
 
netheril96 said:
They only apply to electromagnetic waves.

What does "similar behavior" mean? Half wave loss? Then yes, mechanical waves have half wave loss when reflected on certain conditions too.

Well, by similar behavior, I mean about having a brewster and critical angle, and the same or similar relationships between impedance,transmittance/reflectance, and incident/reflected/transmitted angles.

I am trying to make a ray trace of sound in water, and want to be as comprehensive as possible, so I would like to apply any equations I can.
 
Also what is half wave loss? Are you referring to phase change on reflections ?
 
DragonPetter said:
Also what is half wave loss? Are you referring to phase change on reflections ?

Yes. Or maybe half wave loss is not the correct English name?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top