Do I need to consider mass in the equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average acceleration of a rocket during two time intervals without needing to consider mass in the equations. It clarifies that mass is inherently accounted for in the acceleration calculations, as force is acting on the mass to produce the observed changes in velocity. A misunderstanding arises regarding the formula for average acceleration, where a participant incorrectly includes a factor of two, leading to a correction that emphasizes the proper definition of average in physics. The conversation highlights the difference between statistical and physics definitions of average, ultimately reinforcing that both approaches yield consistent results when properly applied. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately solving the rocket's motion equations.
SavannahN
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a. At launch a rocket ship has a mass M. When it is launched from rest, it takes a time interval t1 to reach speed v1; at t = t2, its speed is v2.
What is the average acceleration of the rocket (i) from the start to t1 and (ii) between t1 and t2?

For now, I am taking question a as example, but these are the follow up questions:

(b. Assuming the acceleration is constant during each time interval (but not necessarily the same in both intervals), what distance does the rocket travel (i) from the start to t1 and (ii) between t1 and t2?

c. Use your symbolic results to calculate the average accelerations and distances for M = 2.25 * 106 kg, t1 = 8.00 s, v1 = 158 km/h, t2 =1.00 min, and v2 = 1580 km/h.)

Homework Equations


a= Δv/Δt
F = M * a?
s = vavg * Δt (in follow up questions)

The Attempt at a Solution


a) a= Δv/Δt
-> aavg = Δv/(2*Δt)
i) aavg = v1/(2*t1)
ii) aavg = (v2-v1)/(2*(t2-t1))

Is this correct or did I need to use mass M in the equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. No, you don't have to use the mass to find the average acceleration. The force is already acting on the mass to produce such acceleration, so mass is already taken into account, resulting in those change in velocities.

2. Where did you get the "2" in aavg = Δv/(2*Δt) ? Why is it there?

Please note that aavg is defined as the change in velocity over that time period, i.e. Δv/Δt. It appears that you're taking a "statistical" definition of "average" here, which may account for the appearance of the "2". This is NOT how it is defined in physics.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Where did you get the "2" in aavg = Δv/(2*Δt) ? Why is it there?
Oh, yes, I see I made a mistake in thinking that dividing by 2 got me the average velocity.

Thank you for the answer!
 
ZapperZ said:
It appears that you're taking a "statistical" definition of "average" here, which may account for the appearance of the "2".
The notions of average are the same in both disciplines. The distinction is between averaging over a uniformly weighted discrete distribution of two elements (sum the element values and multiply by the uniform weight of 0.5) and a time-weighted continuous distribution (e.g. integrate the acceleration over time from start to finish and divide by elapsed time from start to finish).

Of course, if you integrate acceleration over time from start to finish, you get delta v between start and finish. So you get a formula that looks different, but ultimately it is the same concept.
 
  • Like
Likes SavannahN
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top