Do Lorentz Forces Really Violate Newton's 3rd Law?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether Lorentz forces violate Newton's 3rd law of motion. In a scenario with magnets and a current-carrying wire, the upward force on the wire suggests a reaction force on the magnets. It is clarified that the interaction involves three components: the magnet, the wire, and the magnetic field, with the field mediating the interaction. Nonrelativistically, the magnet experiences an opposite force, while relativistically, impulses are exchanged between the wire and the field, with momentum transferred to the field. Ultimately, the missing momentum from the system is accounted for by the field itself.
F-Z
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In classical Lorentz force demonstration, let's say we have 2 permanent magnets generating a magnetic field perpendicular, out from the page and a wire carrying current to the left. Thus we would expect that the Lorentz Force will exert an upward force on the wire.

According to Newton's 3rd law, there should be a reaction to this force. So do the magnets actually being pushed down? Or is there something else to compensate for the momentum?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are three objects: the magnet, the wire, and the field. The field mediates the interaction. Nonrelativistically, you can just consider the action reaction at a distance, so the magnet would be pushed with an opposite force. Relativistically, if the wire expreriences an impulse from the field, then the field experiences an opposite impulse from the wire. This impulse is transferred at the speed c to the magnet. If what you meant by "classically" was "nonrelativistically," then you are talking action-at-a-distance, and Newton's third law treats the two objects, magnet and wire, as interacting directly at a distance.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top