Do Physics Grad Programs Prefer Depth or Breadth in Undergrad Research?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike K
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Depth Research
AI Thread Summary
Physics graduate programs generally prefer candidates who have substantial research experience, which can be gained through working with a single professor over multiple semesters or collaborating with several professors for shorter periods. The depth of research experience is often valued more than the breadth. Staying with one professor throughout the undergraduate career can provide a more cohesive and in-depth understanding of a specific research area, which may be advantageous, especially if it leads to a strong thesis project. However, working with multiple professors can expose students to diverse methodologies and perspectives, which can also be beneficial. The amount of time spent working with professors varies, with some students committing to several semesters of research, while others may engage in shorter, more varied experiences. In the U.S., graduate schools typically look for consistent research involvement throughout the undergraduate years, making it crucial for students to consider their research strategies early in their academic careers.
Mike K
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Do physics graduate programs have any preference of working with a single professor for several semesters or working with several different professors each for just a semester or two?

Is it disadvantageous to stay with one professor for your entire undergraduate career?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much and how long do you expect to actually work with a professor as undergrad in physics? And how long do you plan to stay an undergraduate?
 
mfb said:
How much and how long do you expect to actually work with a professor as undergrad in physics? And how long do you plan to stay an undergraduate?

I have worked with a specific professor for two semesters. I plan to work with him two more, unless I also do my honors project/thesis with him, which could be another semester or two (total of 4-6 semesters, 2-3 years).

As for how much, each semester I take 3 credits of research if that gives you an idea.

I am also working (full time) with a different prof at my hometown university over the summer.

I plan to be an undergrad for 8 semesters total (4 years).
 
Mike K said:
As for how much, each semester I take 3 credits of research if that gives you an idea.
I don't even know which country you are talking about.
Here in Germany you usually take courses for ~2-3 years with little contact to actual research (maybe something like a summer student program), then you start working on the thesis in the group of a professor. Afterwards the BSc thesis is the most important research-related work, for things done earlier it is not important where you did them.
 
mfb said:
I don't even know which country you are talking about.
Here in Germany you usually take courses for ~2-3 years with little contact to actual research (maybe something like a summer student program), then you start working on the thesis in the group of a professor. Afterwards the BSc thesis is the most important research-related work, for things done earlier it is not important where you did them.
I see. It was ignorant of me to forget to say that I go to an American university. My apologies.
In that case though, someone from the US may be a better source since grad schools look for research throughout your undergrad.
Does anyone in America know the answer to my original question?
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top