Do Quantum Mechanics PDFs Converge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
357
Reaction score
33
Consider the double-slit experiment using a low-intensity source of monochromatic photons: If the intensity is low enough, one can observe the photons, one at a time, slowly developing an interference pattern on a photographic plate.

The interference pattern, over time, resembles more and more the continuous probability density function associated with the wave function, i.e. it “converges” to the PDF.

I have just started reading about the different types of convergence in probability theory:

Convergence in Distribution
Convergence in Probability
Almost Sure Convergence
Etc.

Has anybody found QM literature researching the types of convergence that occur in QM random processes?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forget the QM part, it isn't actually important. Your question is more a standard one from sampling theory - if I draw n samples from a distribution, how do the properties of the sample converge on the distribution as n gets very big. The convergence phrases you refer to in your post are more mathematical, different from this empirical effect where a histogram of a large number of samples from a distribution converges on that distribution.
 
peteratcam said:
Forget the QM part, it isn't actually important. Your question is more a standard one from sampling theory - if I draw n samples from a distribution, how do the properties of the sample converge on the distribution as n gets very big. The convergence phrases you refer to in your post are more mathematical, different from this empirical effect where a histogram of a large number of samples from a distribution converges on that distribution.

I realize my question is more mathematical than physical/empirical. But much has been written about the purely mathematical aspects of QM (Von Neumann, etc.).

So, has anyone written about the very specific type of PDFs that are produced by quantum processes?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top