Do speeds of propagating of all interactions have the same value c?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ndung200790
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interactions Value
ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
Please teach me whether this is correct:
It seem to me that the velocity of propagating of all type of interaction is the same value c as the velocity of light.Because equation of propagating of phase p.x=0 leads to v=E/p^(where p^-modul of spacelike-momentum)=square(c)/v then v=c.Where p is 4-momentum of a quantum and p.x is phase of field operator.
Thank you very much in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that even in case the transfer boson is massive,the velocity of propagation of interaction still is c,because of quantum characteristic.Is that correct?
 
<Speed of interaction> is a classical concept applicable to classical theories. (Gravitational and e-m waves traveling at c). However, the 4 interactions can be seen from a quantum perspective, where <speed of interaction> notion will no longer apply.
 
ndung200790 said:
It seems that even in case the transfer boson is massive,the velocity of propagation of interaction still is c,because of quantum characteristic.Is that correct?
No. :rolleyes:
 
Then classical saying the week interaction has the small interaction velocity,because of massive transfer boson?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top