Dodecahedral Metal Coordination: Are There Two Distances to Coordinating Atoms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter osskall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the coordination distances in dodecahedral metal complexes, specifically addressing the discrepancies in cation-anion distances when assuming equal anion-anion distances. Calculations indicate that with equal anion-anion distances of 2R, the resulting cation-anion distances are 3.5R for four anions and 1.8R for the other four. This raises questions about the validity of the assumption of equal anion-anion distances. Additionally, the analysis of capped trigonal prisms reveals a consistent radius ratio of 0.73, while the dodecahedron shows a minimum radius ratio of 0.83, highlighting the complexity of coordination chemistry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coordination chemistry concepts
  • Familiarity with geometric configurations of metal complexes
  • Knowledge of radius ratios in coordination compounds
  • Experience with computational chemistry tools for molecular modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of dodecahedral coordination in metal complexes
  • Explore computational methods for calculating cation-anion distances in coordination chemistry
  • Study the implications of radius ratios in various coordination geometries
  • Investigate the behavior of capped trigonal prisms in coordination environments
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, particularly those specializing in coordination chemistry, molecular modeling experts, and researchers studying metal complexes will benefit from this discussion.

osskall
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Is it true that there should be two distances from a dodecahedrally coordinated cation to the two types of coordinating atoms?
When I calculate what the octahedron should look like assuming that all anion-anion distances are equal I will get two different cation-anion distances:
if all anion-anion distances equal 2R, the cation-anion distances will be 3.5R for four of the anions and only 1.8R (!) for the other four anions.

Does this make sense?
Or am I wrong in assuming that all the anion-anion distances should be equal?

What holds for capped trigonal prisms? There probably there will be a larger cation-anion distance for the capping anions, right? (Otherwise the anions would come too close! Or?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
osskall said:
What holds for capped trigonal prisms? There probably there will be a larger cation-anion distance for the capping anions, right? (Otherwise the anions would come too close! Or?)

OK, I just calculated for a triply capped trigonal prism that there is just one radius ratio: 0.73

For a dodecahedron I calculate 0.83 as the minimum radius ratio (for cation-anion interactions) but this leaves four out of eight coordinating atoms at almost twice the distance (as described above)...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
29K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K