Does a Circular Capacitor with a Dielectric Radiate an Electromagnetic Field?

AI Thread Summary
A discussion on the electromagnetic behavior of a circular capacitor with a dielectric reveals that the magnetic field distribution can be derived assuming a constant electric field. The complex Poynting vector is crucial for demonstrating that the capacitor does not radiate an electromagnetic field, as only the real part contributes to radiation. The time-average of the real Poynting vector is highlighted, emphasizing the need for complex conjugation in calculations. Additionally, the total stored energy density and its relationship to the gradient of the Poynting vector are explored. The discussion references Feynman's lectures for further insights into the problem.
Noname
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Member has been warned not to remove the template.
Hi guys,
Consider a circular capacitor with a disk of radius a and plate separation d, as shown in the figure below. Assuming the capacitor is filled with a dielectric constant epsilon and the capacitor is fed by a time harmonic current I0
(a) Find the magnetic field distribution inside the capacitor assuming that the electric field is constant.
(b) Compute the complex Poynting vector and prove that the capacitor does not radiate an electromagnetic field. (Hint: S=(1/2)ExH ; only Re[S ] radiates an electromagnetic field.)
(c) Compute the total stored energy density W and show that far away from the center (kr<< 1): grad(S)-iwW = 0
(d) Find the surface current density as a function of radial distance on the top plate.

I don't really know how to do the (b). I have S=(1/2)ExH. I think I need to write E and H in complex, I have E=Eo*exp(iwt) and H=Ho*exp(iwt). But I can't prove S is only an imaginary part.

Sans titre.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Sans titre.jpg
    Sans titre.jpg
    9.7 KB · Views: 849
Physics news on Phys.org
Normally, for time-harmonic fields the time-average of the real Poynting vector is:

##\langle \mathbf{S} \rangle=\frac{1}{2}\Re\left( \mathbf{E}^{\dagger} \times \mathbf{H}\right)##

So, I guess, the complex Poynting vector you want is ##\mathbf{E}^{\dagger} \times \mathbf{H}##, i.e. you are missing the complex conjugation (which will remove ##\exp\left(i \omega t\right)##)
 
Feynman treats this problem, (without the dielectric material), in his lectures. See Fig. 27-3 and thereabouts. http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_27.html ## \\ ## He uses a slightly different type of units, but you should find it good reading.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top