Does \(A e^{iA} = e^{iA} A\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russdot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the equation \(A e^{iA} = e^{iA} A\) holds true when A is an operator. It is clarified that since \(e^{A}\) is defined by a power series, and A commutes with itself, it follows that A also commutes with \(e^{A}\). This implies that the original equation is valid under the given conditions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of operators in relation to exponential functions. Overall, the conclusion is that the equation is indeed correct.
russdot
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If A is an operator, is it correct/allowed to say:
Ae^{iA} = e^{iA}A

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of how e^{A} is defined.
 
Ah yes, so since e^{A} is defined with a power series e^{A} = 1 + A + \frac{A^{2}}{2!} + \frac{A^{3}}{3!} + ... and A commutes with itself then A would commute with e^{A}
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top