I Does a humam body movement generate a vacumm trail? and more

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gabriel Ulisses
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Movement
AI Thread Summary
Human body movement does not generate a vacuum trail in the way described, as the concept relates more to aerodynamic drag. When a body part moves, it creates a higher pressure area in front and a lower pressure area behind, but the pressures involved are significantly lower than 78 megapascal, which exceeds atmospheric pressure. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding of how air pressure and drag work in relation to movement. The calculations proposed are impractical given the unrealistic pressure target. Overall, the mechanics of movement and air displacement do not support the idea of creating a vacuum trail with such high pressures.
Gabriel Ulisses
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I will start with an excuse, sorry english is not my main lengauge and i don't practice grammar that much, it is my first time in these forums so be kind, i hope i posted on the right forum thank you for the comprehension.
When you move your arm for example do you generate a trail of vacuum behind it? and does the air ocupating the vacuum space generate force?
I got as especific is i could get if you need anymore values for the calculations ask,i can give preety much anything.
How would you calculate:
What would be the nescessary velocity for a 60cm³ random body part of you (volume) to generate enough vacuum so the air ocupating it space would generate 78 megapascal of pressure on a circle of 3 meter radius?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

What I think you are referring to is aerodynamic drag. There is a higher pressure area in front of you and a lower pressure area behind. But 78 megapascal? Atmospheric pressure is only 0.1 megapascals, so no...
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF!

What I think you are referring to is aerodynamic drag. There is a higher pressure area in front of you and a lower pressure area behind. But 78 megapascal? Atmospheric pressure is only 0.1 megapascals, so no...
I was expecting an absurd number, something actually inhumanly posible, and yes i think aerodynamic drag is watch I'm refeering to, it is the air ocupating the vacuum created by movement right?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top