Does a statistical mechanics of classical fields exist?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of a statistical mechanics framework for classical fields, contrasting it with the traditional approach based on the Liouville equation and Hamiltonian mechanics for point particles. Participants note that while classical fields, especially nonlinear ones, can be studied without statistical methods, there are also statistical approaches available. Kardar's two-part course on statistical mechanics is highlighted as a potential resource, though some participants express concerns about its quantum focus. The need for a general statistical treatment of classical fields remains a topic of interest. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of studying classical fields and the potential for statistical methods to provide insights.
andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
The usual presentation of classical statistical mechanics are based on the Liouville equation and phase space distribution. This, in turn, is based on the Hamiltonian mechanics of a system of point particles.

Real undulatory systems, specially non-linear ones, have to be complex to study without an statistical approach, I guess. I wonder if there exist a general statistical treatment of classical fields, and if so, any good source on the topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thanks for the reference Atty. However, at interesting at it seems, I'm not sure it is what I'm looking for. It seems very quantum focused from the lecture notes, but I have to take a deeper look at it to check.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top