Does a telescope magnify distant objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amith2006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Telescope
AI Thread Summary
A telescope's magnification refers to "angular magnification," not "linear magnification," meaning a 10x magnification does not make an object appear ten times taller. Instead, it creates the illusion of being closer to the object, increasing the subtended angle. While the observer may perceive the tree as larger, it does not change its actual height. The telescope effectively brings distant objects into clearer view, enhancing the observer's perspective. Thus, while the tree may seem more prominent, it does not literally increase in size.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# An observer looks at a tree of height 15 meters with a telescope of magnifying power 10. How does the tree appear to the man?
I think the tree will appear to be 10 times taller. Is it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that exactly how the question is stated?

In short, you are correct, but...

Telescope magnification is "angular magnification" not "linear magnification." A 10 X scope does not necessarily mean you will say "oh my god, that looks like a 150 meter tall tree!" You are more likely to have the impression that you are standing closer to the tree such that the subtended angle is increased ten times.
 
Chi Meson said:
Is that exactly how the question is stated?

In short, you are correct, but...

Telescope magnification is "angular magnification" not "linear magnification." A 10 X scope does not necessarily mean you will say "oh my god, that looks like a 150 meter tall tree!" You are more likely to have the impression that you are standing closer to the tree such that the subtended angle is increased ten times.
The tree is at a large distance from the man. The telescope brings the image of the tree nearer. Can’t we call that feature of the telescope as magnification?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
492
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top