Does Adding Multiple Point Loads on a Continuous Beam Reduce the Maximum Moment?

AI Thread Summary
Adding multiple point loads on a continuous beam can indeed affect the maximum moment, as the interaction between loads can lead to a reduction in the moment compared to a single load scenario. When two loads are applied closely together, the maximum moment may not simply double, as the loads can partially cancel each other out due to the beam's support conditions. The radius of gyration is significant as it relates the moment of inertia to the cross-sectional area, providing insight into a beam's stiffness and stability. It is particularly useful in evaluating critical buckling loads, as it indicates how the area is distributed relative to the axis. Understanding these concepts is crucial for effective structural analysis and design.
student1856
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is the moment in a continuous beam maximum when there is one point load because if you had multiple point loads they would cancel each other out since there are several pin connections along the beam?

For example, if I had a 20 kip load moving across a continuous beam and found the maximum moment in the beam, and then decided to add a second 20 kip load moving a bit behind the first load, there would be less moment in the second scenario even though there is 40 kips total moving across the beam oppose to the original 20 kips?

Also can anyone explain what the purpose is in radius of gyration oppose to just moment of inertia?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
student1856 said:
Is the moment in a continuous beam maximum when there is one point load because if you had multiple point loads they would cancel each other out since there are several pin connections along the beam?

For example, if I had a 20 kip load moving across a continuous beam and found the maximum moment in the beam, and then decided to add a second 20 kip load moving a bit behind the first load, there would be less moment in the second scenario even though there is 40 kips total moving across the beam oppose to the original 20 kips?

Also can anyone explain what the purpose is in radius of gyration oppose to just moment of inertia?
The gyradius relates the second moment of area to the area of the cross section. A larger value of the gyradius means that for a given cross sectional area, a beam is stiffer than a section with the same area but lower value of the gyradius.

The gyradius is explicitly used when evaluating the critical buckling load of a column.
 
student1856 said:
Is the moment in a continuous beam maximum when there is one point load because if you had multiple point loads they would cancel each other out since there areMa doing ok looks not too bad considering all. several pin connections along the beam?

For example, if I had a 20 kip load moving across a continuous beam and found the maximum moment in the beam, and then decided to add a second 20 kip load moving a bit behind the first load, there would be less moment in the second scenario even though there is 40 kips total moving across the beam oppose to the original 20 kips?
if the 2nd load was just a silly millimeter behind the first, max moment would essentially double the value of the max moment with just the first.
Also can anyone explain what the purpose is in radius of gyration oppose to just moment of inertia?
The radius of gyration, r, is r=\sqrt {I/A}. It is convenient to use it in stability problems. It represents the distance from the reference axis where the area of the section would be concentrated to give the same moment of inertia.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top