Does Adding the Boundary of a Set A Affect Its Distance Metric?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yifli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure
yifli
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that \rho(x,A)=\rho(x,\bar{A}), where \rho is a distance metric

Homework Equations


\rho(x,A)=glb\left\{\rho(x,\alpha),\alpha \in A \right\}
\bar{A} is the closure of A
\partial A, the boundary of an arbitrary set A is the difference between its closure and its interior

The Attempt at a Solution


If A is a closed set, then A=\bar{A}
If A is open, I want to prove adding boundary element of A has no impact on \rho(x, A). this seems to be intuitive, but can't come up with a rigorous proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My initial reaction is that proof by contradiction will be your best bet. It's clear that \rho(x,A)\geq\rho(x, \bar{A}) since A\subseteq\overline{A}, so assume that the inequality is strict, and try to derive a contradiction.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top