Does air resistance affect projectile motion?

AI Thread Summary
Air resistance significantly affects projectile motion, particularly in scenarios involving high speeds or large displacements. Standard equations of motion typically ignore air resistance, assuming constant acceleration, which can lead to considerable errors in calculations. The impact of neglecting air resistance is minimal for low-speed scenarios, such as a ball thrown vertically, but becomes substantial for objects falling from great heights. In cases like a flat piece of paper, air resistance drastically alters the expected results. Proper application of equations requires careful consideration of whether to include complex factors like drag.
Physicist
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

If someone threw a ball vertically & we want to calculate the time needed to for the ball to return back to his hand taking into account air resistance, would it be different if we ignore air resistance??

When they derive the known laws for the maximum height, range & time, did they ignore air resistance?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. They do ignore wind resistance. The standard equations of motion that most people are familiar with deal with a constant acceleration. Wind resistance is not constant.

The amount of error induced is going to depend greatly on the gemoetry, displacemets and speeds involved. In your example of tossing a ball, the error induced by not taking into account drag would be much much less (probably an order of magnitude less) than if the ball was shot up thousands of feet and allowed to come back down. The speeds the ball would reach being thrown would not come close to the speeds it would reach if it fell from a thousand feet. Also consider the fact that if a ball were dropped from a sufficient height, the ball would eventually stop accelerating (due to drag) and would fall at a constant speed.

Also, consider what the equations would tell you if you calculated how long it would take a flat piece of paper to fall from some height. It wouldn't be even close because in that case wind resistance plays a huge role.

It is up to the person applying the equations to make the proper assumption as to whether or not neglecting a complex term is a proper assumption to make.

When they derive the known laws for the maximum height, range & time, did they ignore air resistance?

Maximum height, range and time of what?
 
generally the air resistance is proportional to the instantaneous velocity of the body...so when u actually calculate the equation of motion it is exponential
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top