Does an impeller need a driveshaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theycallmevirgo
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
21 replies · 1K views
theycallmevirgo
Messages
108
Reaction score
25
TL;DR
Is there any reason for an impeller driveshaft other than stability?
I have good basic FEA books, but all the stuff online is focused on chemical mixing.

Thanks so much

Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I just wanted to get a basic idea of what's going on. At this point I can't even select from available options on the market, and I strongly suspect that my application is going to be 50% the size of anything I can buy.

ETA: but I found a book already. I'll be posting another question shortly.
 
I'll move your thread to the ME forum for better replies. Did you look through the hits in my link?

Also, please post your design constraints. We won't be able to help you unless you post your target dimensions, power transfer, water speed range, duct characteristics, etc. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theycallmevirgo
Here's a picture of an impeller from J S Carlton (Marine Propellers and Propulsion 2nd edition 2007)

1589504988903.png


If I understand correctly, the driveshaft is there for the gas motor. If I had an electric motor, could I just use coils around the impeller? Or, alternately, can I drive an electric with gas?

Thanks

Joe
 
theycallmevirgo said:
I'll be posting another question shortly.
Multiple threads merged...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theycallmevirgo
berkeman said:
Multiple threads merged...

Thanks for the help. I don't know half the terms you're listing as design constraints, which is why I need to do some reading. All I know for now is that I strongly suspect overall diameter is going to be 50% of anything on the market right now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theycallmevirgo
OK, very cool. This is now a project worth pursuing.
 
theycallmevirgo said:
If I had an electric motor, could I just use coils around the impeller?
Yes, there are several marine propulsion designs that do basically that. You may need a much bigger diameter of that duct. Here's one that uses permanent magnets. I'm not sure what their top RPM is. I just searched "marine magnetic propulsion".

1589506005077.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and theycallmevirgo
Yeah I looked at the first link, if their efficiency is as they claim it is very promising. Thanks for the help folks!
 
Am I missing something, btw, wrt turbines? If they can be used for hydroelectric generation why not propulsion?
 
theycallmevirgo said:
Am I missing something, btw, wrt turbines? If they can be used for hydroelectric generation why not propulsion?
Turbines being spun by what? Your example of hydroelectric implies you think a water turbine could work here...
 
russ_watters said:
Turbines being spun by what? Your example of hydroelectric implies you think a water turbine could work here...

Yes, that's correct, driven by emagnets.
 
anorlunda said:
recently, diesel-electric has the competitive advantage.
Why do you think that is?

Also, just to make clear, I meant specifically turbine driven by em forces pushing water, not gas turbines pushing a prop (which I've seen numerous examples of).
 
theycallmevirgo said:
Yes, that's correct, driven by emagnets.
"Driven" by magnets? Hang on, just to make sure we have our definitions right:

Impeller: spins and pushes water.
Turbine: is spun by water.

Turbines do not get driven by magnets.
 
russ_watters said:
"Driven" by magnets? Hang on, just to make sure we have our definitions right:

Impeller: spins and pushes water.
Turbine: is spun by water.

Turbines do not get driven by magnets.
OK, let me rephrase, because I'm guessing I'm using the wrong terms. You have a hydro power turbine, which is rotated by water to make electric power. Why can't a (nearly) identical system use electrical power to move water for propulsion?
 
theycallmevirgo said:
OK, let me rephrase, because I'm guessing I'm using the wrong terms. You have a hydro power turbine, which is rotated by water to make electric power. Why can't a (nearly) identical system use electrical power to move water for propulsion?
You can - the other guys have given several examples. I guess I'm not seeing what is unsatisfactory in what you've been given.
 
russ_watters said:
You can - the other guys have given several examples. I guess I'm not seeing what is unsatisfactory in what you've been given.

Well, from my (super-cursory) overview the mechanisms used for generation are much more involved (and much closer to air propulsion turbines) than what was shown. But it's entirely possible I'm mistaken.
 
theycallmevirgo said:
OK, let me rephrase, because I'm guessing I'm using the wrong terms. You have a hydro power turbine, which is rotated by water to make electric power. Why can't a (nearly) identical system use electrical power to move water for propulsion?
Turbines are internally much like a waterwheel, whereas an impeller generally resembles a fan.

By stretching definitions just a little bit, sidewheel and sternwheel boats could be called sideturbine and sternturbine driven. (Sidewheel aka paddlewheel)

Cheers,
Tom
 
theycallmevirgo said:
OK, let me rephrase, because I'm guessing I'm using the wrong terms. You have a hydro power turbine, which is rotated by water to make electric power. Why can't a (nearly) identical system use electrical power to move water for propulsion?
That's what your impeller is. An electric motor turns the shaft and the impeller is a water turbine. That's where you started in this thread.

EM fields directly moving water is called magnetohydrodynamics. It has been researched for decades, but few applications exist. It was even the theme of a Hollywood movie named "Hunt for Red October"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics