Does an object emitting electromagnetic radiation really lose mass?

In summary, Einstein's theory of the quantization of electromagnetic force states that an object emitting electromagnetic radiation will lose its inertial mass. However, the sun does lose mass due to this process, but the amount is negligible compared to its overall mass. The sun also loses mass through other means such as solar wind and CMEs. This raises the question of whether inertial mass is equivalent to active gravitational mass or if they are merely proportional.
  • #1
Bararontok
298
0
Einstein stated in a paper concerning the discovery of the quantization of electromagnetic force that an object emitting electromagnetic radiation will lose its inertial mass. If this is the case, then why does the gravitational force of the sun not weaken and the sun not become less massive as a result of emitting electromagnetic radiation for billions of years? Is inertial mass equivalent to active gravitational mass or are they merely proportional?

sources:

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Development_of_Our_Views_on_the_Composition_and_Essence_of_Radiation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The sun does lose mass, a couple of million tons per second actually...it's just that the sun is so massive that this mass loss is negligible.

For comparison, the sun loses about 4*10^9 kg of mass per second. The Sun's mass is something like 2*10^30kg. So, over a year, the sun loses only 6.3*10^-12% of it's mass. That's only .063% of its mass lost due to fusion over 10 billion years!

The sun may well gain more mass than this over its lifetime. Of course, the sun is also losing mass due to jets of material that it sends out in the form of solar wind and CME's.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
And does this figure for mass loss factor out the emission of plasma jets from the sun, and if not, how much mass does the sun lose due to electromagnetic radiation alone?
 
  • #4
the figure I gave is merely due to radiation loss.
 

Related to Does an object emitting electromagnetic radiation really lose mass?

1. Does an object emitting electromagnetic radiation lose mass?

Yes, according to Einstein's famous equation E=mc², an object that emits electromagnetic radiation will lose a small amount of mass in the process. This is due to the conversion of energy into mass, as described by the equation.

2. How much mass is lost when an object emits electromagnetic radiation?

The amount of mass lost depends on the amount of energy emitted. The equation E=mc² tells us that the energy released is equal to the mass lost multiplied by the speed of light squared. However, this mass loss is usually very small and not noticeable in everyday objects.

3. Can an object regain the lost mass after emitting electromagnetic radiation?

Yes, according to the law of conservation of mass and energy, the mass lost by an object emitting electromagnetic radiation can be regained through the absorption of energy. This process is seen in nuclear reactions, where energy is released and absorbed, leading to changes in an object's mass.

4. Does the speed of light affect the amount of mass lost when an object emits electromagnetic radiation?

Yes, the speed of light plays a crucial role in the amount of mass lost when an object emits electromagnetic radiation. This is because the speed of light is a constant in the equation E=mc² and any changes in its value would result in changes in the amount of mass lost.

5. Are there any practical applications of the concept of mass loss through electromagnetic radiation?

Yes, the concept of mass loss through electromagnetic radiation has various practical applications. For example, it is used in nuclear power plants where energy is released through nuclear reactions, and in particle accelerators where particles are accelerated to near-light speeds, resulting in small changes in their mass.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
10
Views
8K
Back
Top