Does any lattice or lattice shape has a periodic boundary condition?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on constructing a periodic boundary condition (PBC) for a specific lattice shape. Participants express confusion about identifying neighbors under PBC, particularly regarding the left neighbor of site m and the down neighbor of site i, which appear to differ from the original lattice due to the PBC. A suggestion is made to rotate the lattice to clarify neighbor relationships and ensure proper alignment with boundary edges. The conversation highlights the complexity of simulating an Ising model on this modified lattice while maintaining accurate neighbor identification. Ultimately, understanding the PBC's impact on neighbor relationships is crucial for accurate simulations.
qijiongli
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If not, then what are the conditions for us to construct a periodic boundary condition(PBC)?
If so, then please help me construct a PBC for the lattice shape in the attachments.

I want to ask that what lattice site m's left neighbor is and what lattice site i's down neighbor is.From the picture, both m's left and i's down neighbor is the BLUE site, but in the PBC, the neighbors are GREEN and RED correspondingly (right?). However, the GREEN site and the RED site are impossible to be the same site in the PBC(right?). So I'm confused with it.

thanks a lot
 

Attachments

  • angle_45-pbc.jpeg
    angle_45-pbc.jpeg
    22.6 KB · Views: 535
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you joining adjacent edges or opposite edges ? Try rotating the lattice through 45 deg, working out the PBC and then rotating back.
 
Thank you very much for your help.

Do you mean that the direction of the PBC is along the direction of the BOUNDARY EDGE( the dotted GREEN line showed in the attachment)? Then both m's left and i's down neighbor is the BLUE site (K) on the opposite edge.If so, it seems to say that all PBCs are along the direction of the BOUNDARY EDGES?
 

Attachments

  • angle_45-pbc-more.jpeg
    angle_45-pbc-more.jpeg
    23.9 KB · Views: 526
I don't think I understand the problem. Have a look at the picture, I have shown a point in solid yellow and its neighbours in outlines yellow. The corners will have widely 'separated' neighbours.
 

Attachments

  • angle_45-pbc.jpg
    angle_45-pbc.jpg
    23.1 KB · Views: 482
thanks a lot!
Mentz114 said:
I don't think I understand the problem. Have a look at the picture, I have shown a point in solid yellow and its neighbours in outlines yellow. The corners will have widely 'separated' neighbours.

For the above lattice shape, it can be constructed from the square lattice by connecting the next-nearest-neighbor sites.And each site's neighbors are easy to find by the original square lattice.

But I find that it is just a spatial case. And now I want to simulate a Ising model on the following lattice, whose boundary edges are the lines connecting one of the next-next-nearest-neighbors on the square lattice(dotted lines shows). The crossing points of the solid lines will be placed spins. Under the PBC, what the RED site's right and down neighbor will be?
 

Attachments

  • angle_sita-.jpeg
    angle_sita-.jpeg
    16.4 KB · Views: 509
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top