News Does Bush's 9/11 Response Overshadow His Other Mistakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zantra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rating
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on concerns regarding President Bush's potential reelection in 2004, with participants expressing skepticism about his leadership and policies. Key points include the belief that economic indicators may not translate into voter support due to ongoing job losses. There is a sentiment that many voters support Bush primarily for his response to the 9/11 attacks, despite criticism of his overall handling of the economy and foreign policy. Participants also speculate that a new conflict could be used strategically to bolster his image. The conversation reflects a deep frustration with the political landscape and a fear of another four years under Bush's administration, highlighting a perceived disconnect between public perception and the realities of his governance.
Physics news on Phys.org
And he's got nowhere to go but down:P

Hopefully, but if the markets keep rallying, he might start looking really good.
 
Let's hope people vote against Bush, for the sake of the country. The current trend looks good, and no matter how well economic indicators are looking, unless the jobs come back(which they won't, and I'll bet we agree on why), it won't make a difference to the voters. Unfortunately, we also have a problem in this country where people vote for anyone who claims to be a Republican, no matter how much of an idiot he is. That could be the topic of a whole other thread.
 
I fear we are inevitably doomed to another 4 years with that moron
 
I know some people who's faith in humanity is on the line... If Bush gets reelected, I know some people who will become really depressed.
 
Based on coversations I've had with people, a major sentiment in his favor was the way he handled the 9/11 situation. Granted closer examination shows how it was all orchestrated, but most people simply look at the fact that he sent troops to hunt down terroists, and nothing more. That's their main reason for supporting him. And then they try and talk their way out of the tons of other mistakes he's made with the economy and foreign policy.


God help us all.
 
Originally posted by Zantra
I fear we are inevitably doomed to another 4 years with that moron
The 'traditional' trick maybe be a new war or a serious conflict with a state of the axe of evil. That fits in newcon's strategy.
 
Originally posted by Zantra
Based on coversations I've had with people, a major sentiment in his favor was the way he handled the 9/11 situation. Granted closer examination shows how it was all orchestrated, but most people simply look at the fact that he sent troops to hunt down terroists, and nothing more. That's their main reason for supporting him. And then they try and talk their way out of the tons of other mistakes he's made with the economy and foreign policy.


God help us all.
Well, it is one of those things...he was the man in charge, and he acted...for a moment, at least, he seemed to some to be a leader. He is a 'good' leader, I guess; he says what people want to hear, he never backs down. At some point, though, the fact that his statements were flawed at best, lies at worst, and his actions have been generally wrong...all that will come out.
 

Similar threads

Replies
88
Views
13K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
56
Views
11K
Replies
49
Views
11K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top