Does Electric Field Strength Depend on Electrode Shape and Measurement Point?

AI Thread Summary
Electric field strength is determined by the potential difference and distance, as expressed in the formula E = ΔV/d. While this equation is primarily valid for parallel plate capacitors, it can serve as an estimation for concentric cylindrical configurations under certain conditions. The electric field will remain consistent at 20 V/m for a 10 V potential difference over a distance of 50 cm, regardless of electrode shape, as long as the assumptions of the model hold true. Measurement points in relation to the electrodes do not affect the calculation as long as the distance is accurately measured. The discussion also raises questions about the applicability of linear versus surface charge density for cylindrical geometries.
quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2
hi, i have a question.

if electric field is 20V/m for a 10 V parallel plates potential difference of distance 50cm, in accordance with the formula E = change in V / d then does it mean that as long as i have a 10 V potential difference, regardless of the orientation of the plates, like if i change the 10 V difference to a small +ve cylinder and a large -ve cylinder encompassing it, does the E field still remains as 20V/m if the distance is kept at 50cm?

so in other words, does the electric field E remain the same as long as the Volt difference i use is kept at 10V and the distance is 50cm? that means 10V difference at a distance of 50cm always give me E field of 20V/m?

oh by the way, does it matter if i measure the distance from the (-ve)0 V plate or from the (+ve)10V plate if i want to use in the formula E = V/d?

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation is only valid for parallel plate capacitors. You could probably use it as an estimation for concentric cylindrical plate capacitors though one would want to investigate the conditions under which the equation would still be accurate.

As for the last question, how would it matter?
 
ah i see... thanks

so would it be ok to use the linear charge density for this cylindrical example or is that only used for long thin rods? or am i suppose to use surface charge density?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top