Does Electrostatic Potential Obey Superposition?

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
why does electrostatic potential obey superposition?

it's a solution of poisson's equation and solutions of poisson's equation definitely do not obey superposition!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If \nabla^2 \varphi_1 = -\rho_1 / \epsilon_0 and \nabla^2 \varphi_2 = -\rho_2 / \epsilon_0, then \varphi_1 + \varphi_2 satisfies \nabla^2 \varphi = -(\rho_1 + \rho_2) / \epsilon_0, i.e. the potential of the combined charge distribution \rho_1 + \rho_2 is the sum of the potentials of the individual distributions.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top