Does energy barely leave the sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alex_boothby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Sphere
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of energy in a sphere, specifically a ball bearing rolling down a slope. The equation presented combines kinetic and potential energy, suggesting minimal energy loss, quantified at less than 0.000001738%. Participants express skepticism about the accuracy of this percentage and question the conditions under which energy would be lost. The consensus is that, in an ideal scenario, a perfect sphere would not lose energy. The conversation emphasizes the importance of specifying conditions to understand energy conservation in this context.
alex_boothby
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
hi,

I've just found ou that ke (translation) + ke (rotational) = Potetntial

i.e • ½ I *angular speed(squared) + 1/2mv(squared) = mgh


is ther anything else i can derive from this. as that is all basically I've written, and that , This proves that hardly any energy is lost, with an average of less than 0.000001738% loss of energy, it shows that the energy does not leave the sphere
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have to be more specific... like perhaps tell us the question... because I am not sure from where u got that percentage
 
its a ball bearing rolling down a slope, and then released at different distances
 
Why should energy be lost from sphere? The equation shows energy in the sphere is conserved. As stunner was stunned, even I am stunned with the percentage of energy loss you gave. An ideal ball bearing, which is an ideal sphere will never lose an energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top