Does Every Field Have a Subfield Isomorphic to Q or Z mod p?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ECmathstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Fields
ECmathstudent
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I just wrote an exam in Algebra II, and one of our true or false questions got me thinking. Does every field have a subfield which is isomorphic to the Q or Z mod p? I put it as true, for the wrong reasons, vaguely remembering a similar statement about integral domains and mixing it up. So, after the exam I was sure I was wrong.
But doesn't every field have the subfield {0,1}? Wouldn't this make the statement true, if somewhat vacuously?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's called the prime subfield, which is the intersection of all subfields of the given field. it's isomorphic to Q or Z_p depending on whether the field has characteristic 0 or p
 
Oh, thanks. I don't have a book anymore, when I tried to look it up on google I wasn't really getting any results.
 
yes.

it is quite easy to show this.

suppose 1+1+...+1 (n times) = 0.

then the subring generated by 1 is isomorphic to Zn.

however, since F is a field, none of the elements:

1, 1+1, 1+1+1, etc. can be a zero-divisor, which forces n to be prime.

on the other hand, suppose that n1 is never 0, for all n in Z+.

then the subring generated by 1 is isomorphic to the integers, and

any field containing the integers also contains the field of quotients of the integers, which is Q.

(also {0,1} is not a field, unless 1+1 = 0).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top