Does existence depend on math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dremmer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the question of whether existence is dependent on mathematics. Participants express confusion over the question, asserting that existence can occur independently of mathematical concepts. There is a call for clarification on the original query, as it does not align with the forum's focus on technical math issues. The consensus suggests that physical entities exist regardless of mathematical understanding. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the distinction between existence and mathematical knowledge.
Dremmer
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Can existence not exist without math?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am sorry, but this question does not meet the purpose of the mathematics forums. This forum is only suitable for technical math questions.
 
I have no clue what that question could even mean! The best I can make of it is that, yes, rocks, ducks, and other things exist without knowing any math and without any person who knows math knowing about them.

Dremmer, please give us a better explanation of what you mean.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top