Does expanding space affect time dilation etc?

Dizzle
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
In special relativity we have the velocity 'u', being the difference in speed between two objects, from which we work out time dilation, length contraction etc.

But if those objects are separated by some expanding space, but not moving with respect to that space, is there still the dilation effect?

What if both moved towards each other at the same speed as the space expanded between them, so the net effect what they weren't moving with respect to each other? Would there be no time dilation etc then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For expanding space, I think you run into the issue that you cannot define a single IFR that encompasses both objects. That's why speeding tickets are not issued to galaxies which are receding from us at > c.

If they are stationary w/ respect to each other, I can't see how there would be an time dilation between them regardless of other circumstances, but in the absence of their being in the same IFR I'm not as sure about that.
 
Dizzle said:
if those objects are separated by some expanding space, but not moving with respect to that space, is there still the dilation effect?

This question isn't really answerable, because the concept of "time dilation" is not well-defined if "space" is expanding. ("Expanding space" isn't really the best description of what's going on, but going into that would probably be too much for this thread.)

Dizzle said:
What if both moved towards each other at the same speed as the space expanded between them, so the net effect what they weren't moving with respect to each other? Would there be no time dilation etc then?

Same answer as above.

You can make the questions well defined by considering, instead of "time dilation", something like the observed redshift/blueshift of light signals exchanged between the two objects. Then the answer would be that in the first case, each object would observe the other's light to be redshifted, and in the second case, each object would observe no redshift/blueshift in the other's light.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...

Similar threads

Back
Top