Does Friction at the Axis of Rotation Affect Torque Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lillybeans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of torque in a system involving a spool of wire unwinding under a constant force. The initial confusion arises from the assumption that friction does not contribute to torque in part A of the problem, leading to a correct answer despite not accounting for friction's opposing torque. However, in part B, the force of friction is explicitly calculated, creating a contradiction in understanding its role. The key realization is that friction acts at the axis of rotation, resulting in zero torque contribution from friction. This highlights the importance of recognizing when to include or exclude friction in torque calculations.
lillybeans
Messages
67
Reaction score
1
A question in my textbook made me think:

A spool of wire of mass M and radius R resting on some surface is unwound under a constant force F. Assume the spool is a uniform solid cylinder that doesn't slip, show that a) the acceleration of the center of mass is 4F/3M and b) the force of friction is to the right and equal in magnitude to F/3.


30d849k.jpg

I solved both part a) and b) correctly, but now a contradiction arises.

in part a), I set: Tf=Ia, where Tf is the torque generated by F. So I wrote (RF=Ia, then solved from there.) But now I'm wondering why did I get the right answer when I didn't include the torque caused by friction in the opposite direction. Clearly, there is friction, or otherwise the thing would be slipping. If there is friction, it would produce a torque in the counterclockwise direction, no? so for net torque, shouldn't I have written:

Tnet= Tf-TFf=Ia instead of Tf=Ia? But if I do that, I won't get the right answer!

So if part A is solved without friction, why are they asking for force of friction in part B? isn't that kind of strange that in part a) we assume friction produce no negative torque but in part b) it impedes the motion? In part b) I wrote "F-Ff=ma" and solved from there. Why do we not include torque caused by friction in part A when solving for net torque?

In fact, when do we EVER include torque caused by friction in the calculation of these problems? Am I double counting friction here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry everyone, I just had an ah-ha moment 2 picoseconds after I clicked submit reply.

Friction acts at the axis of rotation, thus T=R*Ff=0 since R=0.

My bad!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top