Does Gas Density Influence Expansion When Heated?

AI Thread Summary
Gas expansion when heated is primarily influenced by temperature and the number of moles, rather than density. For ideal gases, density does not affect expansion, and even for real gases, factors like molecular size and Van der Waals forces play a more significant role. Both Xenon and Helium, despite their differing densities, will expand similarly under the same conditions of volume and temperature. The energy distribution among molecular motions also impacts how gases respond to heat, with different gases having varying degrees of translational and rotational energy storage. Ultimately, density alone does not dictate the extent of gas expansion when heated.
s.p.q.r
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Apart from heat and number of moles, what dictates how much a gas will expand when exposed to heat.
Is it density?

The density of Xenon is 5.894 g/L and the density of Helium is 0.1786 g/L does this mean that if they were both in the same conditions of volume of container, number of moles and both exposed to 100 degress C. , that Xenon would expand more because it has larger density?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For an ideal gas only pressure and temperature.
Even for a real gas density doesn't have an effect.
There are two extra terms to account for the actual size of the molecules, which stop the gas going to zero volume at zero temperature.
And the Van de Waals forces which stick molecules together reducing the amount they expand with temperature.
 
With gases, it is important to distinguish
MASS density = mass/Volume
NUMBER density = N/Volume .
Temperature is proportional to Energy/N/3 dimensions of translation,
but Added Energy (that is, Heat) spreads out among
(into?) these 3d, plus EXTRA modes of motion for most molecules.
Xenon and Helium have no extra modes of motion (being single atoms)
but H2, N2, O2, CO2, etc have 2 rotation axes that hold Energy,
and H2O, NH3, CH4, etc have 3 extra motions to store Energy in.

A thermometer only samples 3/3, or 3/5, or 3/6 of the molecule Energy
(from mon-atomic, linear, or 3-d gas molecules) ...
A Pressure-meter only samples 2/3, or 2/5, or 2/6 of their Energy.

That's why PV = 2/2 nRT ...
but KE_translation = 1/2 mv^2 = 3/2 nRT
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top