only1universe
- 28
- 0
Basically since we use QM for the very small, and GR for anything bigger than an Atom, can we assume GR has no place in the universe if there is no matter?
The discussion revolves around the applicability of General Relativity (GR) in a hypothetical universe devoid of matter. Participants explore the implications of such a scenario, considering theoretical frameworks and the nature of gravity, energy, and vacuum states.
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the applicability of GR in a matter-less universe. While some assert that GR remains valid, others challenge the assumptions and implications of such a scenario, leading to multiple competing views.
The discussion highlights limitations in defining terms such as "vacuum" and "negative vacuum pressure," as well as the dependence on various assumptions about energy and fields in a universe devoid of matter.
Bill_K said:Gravity couples to energy, not to "matter". Does your universe without matter also have no electromagnetism?
Bill_K said:Gravity couples to energy, not to "matter". Does your universe without matter also have no electromagnetism?
Galron said:GR always holds it is a law. If it doesn't hold then you would ask the question why not. I know that sounds Zen but think about it...
Ok now you have reached Nirvana. In what universe would GR not apply?
only1universe said:a universe where none of what it governs exists :)
Galron said:![]()
utesfan100 said:It seems to me that in an empty universe GR would still apply, and result in a Minkowski metric.
But then, what is a metric without an observer? Unless we have a mass-energy free observer somewhere ... hovering over the face of a bland and lifeless void.
only1universe said:Could a vacuum act as an observer? It seems the fact that it can and does interact with particles and/or vacuum pressure fluctuation would be re-iterating information.
Drakkith said:That depends on what you mean by vacuum. In reality a vacuum is still occupied by various fields, as the electromagnetic force and gravitation have an infinite range. We usually mean vacuum to be the removal of nearly all matter within a volume. If you mean vacuum to be the absence of absolutely everything, all matter, energy, and mass, then I don't see how, as not only would there be nothing to observe, but I'm not sure you could even call this vacuum "something".
only1universe said:Whats the minimum that would be required for there to be a negative vacuum pressure? Could there be a negative pressure simply due to the absence of matter once all else is removed?
Drakkith said:Matter or mass?
only1universe said:Mass gone, matter's ability to take up 3 dimensions leaves a negative vacuum pressure in its absence.
Drakkith said:It is the mass that affects spacetime, not the matter itself. The ability for matter to form 3d structures has nothing to do with vacuum pressure. As to the absence of mass, I don't know. If having no mass affected the vacuum pressure, then I would expect the existence of mass in an area to slow down local expansion. However I have no idea if this is true or if it measureable on such short scales.
only1universe said:Well if having no mass did effect the pressure, I'd have to say that masses information had been observed by the negative vacuum pressure. Which leads me of course to wonder if negative vacuum pressure can induce energy and mass again.