Does Gravity Cause Heat Flow to the Center of the Earth?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the causes of high temperatures in Earth's core, emphasizing that atomic collisions in a gravitational field do not lead to heat flow toward the center. It argues that gravity's effects are offset by hydrostatic pressure in liquids, preventing energetic collisions that would violate the second law of thermodynamics. The Earth's core generates heat primarily from the freezing of the inner core, which releases latent heat, and the release of gravitational potential energy as the inner core grows denser. While some radioactive materials may contribute to core heat, their impact is considered minimal by geophysicists. Overall, heat flows upward, with the core being hotter due to gravitational forces and limited radioactivity.
Chas Tennis
Messages
23
Reaction score
4
Here is a review article identifying some causes for the high temperature in the central volume of the Earth. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-is-the-Earth's-core-so/

Inside all massive astronomical bodies like the Earth, collisions of atoms occur in a gravitational field. Because of gravity, atoms moving toward the center of mass of the Earth would have greater velocities associated with them than atoms moving away from the center of mass.

Within the Earth, are atomic collisions toward the Earth's center of mass more energetic than those for atoms moving away from its center of mass? Would that factor tend to cause heat flow toward the center of mass?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't think so. Gravity in a liquid is offset by hydrostatic pressure.
That is why you are near weightless under water.
In a liquid atoms or molecules do not collide.
For that you need a gas, where in the constituent particles are ballistic.
 
Chas Tennis said:
Within the Earth, are atomic collisions toward the Earth's center of mass more energetic than those for atoms moving away from its center of mass? Would that factor tend to cause heat flow toward the center of mass?
No. That would violate the second law of thermodynamics.

That said, the Earth's core does generate heat. There might be some radioactive material in the Earth's core. Most geophysicists don't think there would be very much, but there might be some. The reason is the chemistry of the sidereophiles in the Earth's core and the lithophiles in the mantle and crust.

Two larger sources of heat are a result of the Earth's growing inner core. Freezing is an exothermic reaction; it releases latent heat. Finally, gravitation does play a role in generating heat in the Earth's core. There is a marked density discontinuity at the inner core / outer core boundary. The inner core is more dense than is the outer core. This means that gravitational potential energy is being released as heat as the inner core grows.
 
Chas Tennis said:
Within the Earth, are atomic collisions toward the Earth's center of mass more energetic than those for atoms moving away from its center of mass? Would that factor tend to cause heat flow toward the center of mass?

Heat flows in the opposite direction, its hotter deep down due to gravitation and probably a little radioactivity. You don't see volcanoes spewing out ice.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top