Does Gravity Expand and Collapse or is it Always Present?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zeteg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Gravity
AI Thread Summary
Gravity is generated by all matter and is not instantaneous; it propagates at the speed of light. When a planet is created between two distant objects, the gravitational influence reaches them in ripples, taking time to affect their motion. Conversely, if the planet is removed, the gravitational effects will also take time to be felt unless the objects are already influenced by the planet's gravity. Thus, the changes in gravitational force depend on the distance and the presence of intervening mass. Understanding gravity's propagation is crucial in astrophysics and cosmology.
Zeteg
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
I'm aware that all matter generates their own Gravity, and thus everything is held together, for the Gravity part anyway. However, my question is: Is Gravity all existant, or does it expand/collapse at a rate?

To clairify my question a bit, I'll ask this. If we were 2 apples in space at quite a large distance apart, and we were to create a planet inbetween them, that had the gravity to pull the apples in, within a short time frame.
Now, is the Gravity instantly existent at the apples, when the planet is created, or does it take time for the Gravity to reach the apples?

Similarly, if we were to nullify the planet, would the gravity instantly dissapear, or would it gradually nullify?

Thanks =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity, as proposed by Einstein, travels at the speed of light. Put a planet in betweent he apples, and the gravity will travel in ripples until reaching it's destination. If you remove the planet, I must ask the question, "Are the apples on the planet?" If so, then the affects of removing the planet will be immideately. Otherwise, it will take time to notice the change.
 
Ah, thank you :)
 
No problem, dude.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top