Does hooke's law account for the force of friction on a horizontal spring?

AI Thread Summary
Hooke's law, expressed as F = -kx, applies to ideal springs but does not account for friction, which must be included separately in force calculations. For a vertical spring, the net force can be correctly represented as Fnet = -kx - mg, where mg accounts for gravitational force. The signs in these equations are crucial; the direction of displacement affects the sign of the spring force. When analyzing forces, it's important to maintain consistent sign conventions, especially when dealing with gravity and spring displacement. Understanding these principles clarifies how forces interact in both vertical and horizontal spring scenarios.
joej24
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Whether or not the spring is vertical or not, assuming that the spring is ideal, is Fnet always equal to -kx?

Is it incorrect to write the sum of the forces of a vertical spring as Fnet = -kx - mg?

And does hooke's law account for the force of friction on a horizontal spring? If not would the sum of the forces look like this? Fnet = -kx - \muN


Homework Equations


F = -kx


The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
joej24 said:

Homework Statement


Whether or not the spring is vertical or not, assuming that the spring is ideal, is Fnet always equal to -kx?

No, for a vertical spring, you do have to include gravity.

joej24 said:
Is it incorrect to write the sum of the forces of a vertical spring as Fnet = -kx - mg?

For a vertical spring, this is in fact correct.

joej24 said:
And does hooke's law account for the force of friction on a horizontal spring? If not would the sum of the forces look like this? Fnet = -kx - \muN

Hooke's law doesn't include friction automatically. Hooke's law has to do with the spring restoring force only. If there is friction, you have to include it explicitly. The way you did it there is ok, but be careful with the signs. Friction always opposes the motion, so if the mass is moving in the + direction, the frictional force is negative, and if the mass is moving in the - direction, the frictional force is positive. So there isn't one equation that will be correct at all times.
 
If a vertical spring is hanging and at rest, its net force = 0.
So that means F = 0 = -kx - mg, but doesn't the force of the spring oppose the force of gravity? How does this make sense? The force of gravity always points downward ( is negative), but -kx is negative when the spring is stretched and at rest.
 
joej24 said:
If a vertical spring is hanging and at rest, its net force = 0.
So that means F = 0 = -kx - mg, but doesn't the force of the spring oppose the force of gravity? How does this make sense? The force of gravity always points downward ( is negative), but -kx is negative when the spring is stretched and at rest.

This is a case where you have to be careful about signs. First of all, the length that goes into Hooke's law is a displacement. I'll use the symbol 'y' instead of 'x', since y is usually used for the vertical position coordinate, and x for the horizontal position coordinate. Hooke's law should really be written as:

F = -kΔy​

where

Δy ≡ y - y0

In this expression, y0 is the position at which the spring is neither stretched nor compressed. The reason we can write F = -ky is because, in general we can choose the origin of our coordinate system to be at y0 (i.e. we can choose y0 = 0) so that all other positions are measured from this reference point. But the key point here is that y is the spring displacement and as such, it is a vector. At the very least, for a 1D situation, y must have an intrinsic sign (+ or -) that tells you which direction this displacement is in.

Next, we come to sign conventions. This is another case where we have the freedom to choose something. Gravity points downward. So, if you write F = -mg, you've implicity chosen the sign convention that "downward is negative" (i.e. downward is the negative y direction). If so, this affects the sign of the displacement y. In the force balance equation,

F = -mg - ky,​

if you stretch the spring, then the position of the mass goes down below the position at which the spring is undisplaced. Since downward is negative, this means that the displacement is negative: y < 0. But if y is negative, then it follows that the spring force is positive: -ky > 0. So, when the spring is stretched, the spring force is positive and points upward, counteracting gravity, just as you would expect. Similarly, if the spring is compressed, then the position, y, of the mass goes up above the position at which the spring is undisplaced. In other words the displacement is positive: y > 0. As a result, -ky < 0 and a compressed spring has a restoring force that points downward, just as you would expect.

You are free, of course, to choose the opposite sign convention in which "downward is positive". Under this sign convention, we write gravity as F = +mg, and the total force becomes:

F = mg - ky​

Now, if the mass is initially at y = 0 (the position for which the spring is undisplaced) and then you stretch it by a small amount, its new position is physically below the zero-point. Since downward has been defined to be positive, it follows that the displacement is positive: y > 0. Therefore -ky < 0, and the spring force points in the negative direction (upward) just as one would expect. If the spring is compressed, the the mass moves above the zero-point. Since upward is negative, it follows that the displacement is negative: y < 0. As a result, -ky > 0, and the force for a compressed spring points in the positive (downward) direction as one would expect.

This second sign convention is perhaps more intuitive, since a positive displacement in y corresponds to spring extension (lengthening) and a negative displacement in y corresponds to spring compression (shortening).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top