Does Integral Transformation Apply in Equality of Modified Bessel Functions?

Combinatus
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
Change of variables for integral

Homework Statement



Determine whether the following equality holds:

\displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(x^2+4z^2)}{4z}}}{2z} \, \mathrm{d}z = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(1+z^2)x}{2z}}}{2z} \, \mathrm{d}z, \forall x,z \in \mathbb R_+

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I obtained the first integral after fiddling around with the integral

K_0(x) := \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} e^{-x\cdot\cosh{z}} \, \mathrm{d}z

using the substitution \tau := \dfrac{xe^z}{2}. Note that K_0(x) is a modified Bessel function of the second kind of order 0. The second integral was something I came across after playing around with Rohatgi's "product convolution" integral for independent exponential random variables for a while. Mathematica claims that the second integral is also K_0(x), and numerical integration seems to show that the original equality holds. The integrals look similar enough that some simple transformation seems relevant, but I haven't managed to find one yet.

Obviously, determining how Mathematica concluded that the second integral is K_0(x) would be helpful, too.

Hints?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try substituting a simple multiple of z.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Substituting u=2z in the first integral yields

\displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(x^2+4z^2)}{4z}}}{2z} \, \mathrm{d}z = \displaystyle\int_0^{\infty} \frac{e^{-\dfrac{(x^2+u^2)}{2u}}}{2u} \, \mathrm{d}u.

Not bad! I'll try out some more elementary transformations tomorrow. Thanks!
 
If u = 2z, the lower denominator of the transformed integral (originally 2z) should be u rather than 2u.
 
SteamKing said:
If u = 2z, the lower denominator of the transformed integral (originally 2z) should be u rather than 2u.

Well, maybe I'm too tired, but isn't \mathrm{d}z=\dfrac{\mathrm{d}u}{2}?
 
Combinatus said:
Well, maybe I'm too tired, but isn't \mathrm{d}z=\dfrac{\mathrm{d}u}{2}?

You are correct.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top