Does Interbreeding and Domestication Increase or Decrease Genetic Diversity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter diatom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    diversity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of human races and cultures intermingling to form a single homogenous group, questioning whether this would lead to increased or decreased genetic diversity. It is noted that the concept of a "homogenous race" is problematic, as humans are already a single species with relatively low genetic diversity. If all humans were to become one ethnicity, overall genetic diversity would likely decrease. The conversation also touches on the genetic diversity within wolf species and domesticated dogs. It is suggested that domestication has led to increased diversity among dogs, while the wild wolf population may exhibit greater genetic diversity compared to domesticated dogs. The complexities of these genetic dynamics highlight the nuanced relationship between interbreeding, diversity, and species robustness.
diatom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If all the different races or cultures of mankind began to intermingle and reproduce with one another until there was just one homogenous culture or race, would the genetic diversity of the species as a whole have lessened or grown. Would the species as a whole be more robust before or after the homogenization occurred?

I realize there's probably something wrong with saying "one homogenous race" because it's not really clear what that means, but my question was inspired by someone else's comments made on another site, so I don't know how else to phrase it.

Is there more genetic diversity within the wolf species (including domesticated dogs) now that dogs have been bred by man? Is there more genetic diversity within the wolf population (not including domesticated dogs) than there is within the population of domesticated dogs?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
diatom said:
If all the different races or cultures of mankind began to intermingle and reproduce with one another until there was just one homogenous culture or race, would the genetic diversity of the species as a whole have lessened or grown. Would the species as a whole be more robust before or after the homogenization occurred?

I realize there's probably something wrong with saying "one homogenous race" because it's not really clear what that means, but my question was inspired by someone else's comments made on another site, so I don't know how else to phrase it.

Is there more genetic diversity within the wolf species (including domesticated dogs) now that dogs have been bred by man? Is there more genetic diversity within the wolf population (not including domesticated dogs) than there is within the population of domesticated dogs?

You are asking two very separate questions.

Firstly regarding humans; "homogeneous race" really doesn't make much sense to me. We are already one species with pretty low diversity and we do intermingle and reproduce. However to answer your question if we were all one ethnicity then yes our diversity will have gone down.

Secondly I'm not an expert on the subject but I know that through domestication we have caused the speciation of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_domestic_dog#Specialization", so yes we have increased their diversity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top