Does Length Contraction Affect the Wavelength of Light from a Moving Source?

Zero-G
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey, sorry if this is a stupid question but I'm getting really confused...
If I am standing on the Earth and watch a spaceship moving past at say 0.8*c from left to right, I will observe the spaceship to contract in its direction of motion. If a person on the spaceship shines a torch also from left to right, what happens to the wavelength of the light as seen from my reference frame? Does it also contract?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zero-G said:
Hey, sorry if this is a stupid question but I'm getting really confused...
If I am standing on the Earth and watch a spaceship moving past at say 0.8*c from left to right, I will observe the spaceship to contract in its direction of motion. If a person on the spaceship shines a torch also from left to right, what happens to the wavelength of the light as seen from my reference frame? Does it also contract?
In the ship's frame, the wave peaks move at c, so the distance between peaks is just c/f, where f is the frequency that the peaks are being emitted by the torch as seen in the ship's frame. In your frame, the peaks still move at c, but the frequency becomes f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} due to time dilation, and meanwhile the torch is moving at velocity v so it will have moved a distance of v / (f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) between emitting successive peaks, so the the distance between peaks should either be c / (f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) - v / (f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) or c / (f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) + v / (f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) depending on whether the torch is shining in the direction of the ship's motion or in the opposite direction. This simplifies to (c \pm v)/(f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}). You could also get this from the relativistic doppler shift equation, f_{observed} = f_{emitted} \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} / (1 - v/c), keeping in mind that the wavelength you observe is c / f_{observed}.

To compare the wavelength you see with the wavelength seen by the ship-observer, just divide (c \pm v)/(f \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) (the wavelength seen by you) by c/f (the wavelength seen by the ship-observer), which gives (1 \pm v/c) / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} for the factor that the wavelength changes in your frame. This is not the same as the Lorentz contraction factor \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top