I Does observed light travel faster or slower than unobserved?

scifimath
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I realize that unobserved light it going to be difficult to measure, but could the double slit experiment be set up to give us an average air time for the particles? I find it hard to believe that a particle acting as a wave would travel at exactly the same speed as an observed one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have been reading popularizations based on misconceptions from almost a century ago, before the modern theory of quantum mechanics was developed. The idea that things act as waves when they aren't observed and as particles when they are observed was abandoned long ago and is no part of the modern formalism of quantum mechanics.
 
So it's not worth testing out ..just-in-case?
 
scifimath said:
So it's not worth testing out ..just-in-case?
There's no way of saying whether the experiment is worth doing until until you have described it in detail: How are you setting things up, what are you going to measure when, what results does quantum mechanics predict for these measurements, how does your experiment differ from experiments that have already been done so that it's asking a new question?
Of course you cannot specify the last two until you know enough of the existing theory to calculate (quantitatively, not qualitatively!) what it says should happen and are familiar with the experiments that have already been done.

You started this thread at the I level, so you may be comfortable with something like Susskind's https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465062903/?tag=pfamazon01-20. That won't help so much with the details of the experiments that have already been done, but it will start you in on what quantum mechanics really says.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top