Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Does oxygen in water have an sp3 orbital structure?

  1. Dec 1, 2012 #1

    edguy99

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The angle of the water H2O molecule is 104.5°, the angle of ammonia H3N is 107°.

    The angle between 2 p-orbitals is 90°, the angle between 2 sp3 hybrid orbitals is 109°28', the tetrahedral angle.

    Why is it assumed that water is a "greatly" expanded p-orbital angle, rather then a "slightly" contracted sp3 orbital?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 1, 2012 #2

    chemisttree

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Please explain to me what you mean by a 'greatly' expanded p-orbital angle for water and who told you or where did you see this?
     
  4. Dec 1, 2012 #3

    edguy99

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    from "An Introduction to the Electronic Structure of Atoms and Molecules"
    Dr. Richard F.W. Bader, Professor of Chemistry / McMaster University / Hamilton, Ontario

    http://www.chemistry.mcmaster.ca/esam/Chapter_6/section_4.html

    "The actual bond angle in the water molecule is 104.5°. The opening of the angle to a value greater than the predicted one of 90° can be accounted for in terms of a lessening of the repulsion between the hydrogen nuclei."
     
  5. Dec 1, 2012 #4

    chemisttree

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    OK, let's look at his entire discussion relative to the point.
    You note he uses the word 'assumption' and 'to a first rough approximation' in his discussion. This suggests to you that the valence bond theory doesn't adequately describe what is observed (although the professor never explicitly states that)
    He then goes on to describe hybridization which better describes what is observed but with different examples. He is a poor teacher, that's all.
     
  6. Dec 1, 2012 #5

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The point is that the energy difference between s and p orbitals in oxygen is fairly large, so that s-p hybridization is energetically unfavorable in water.
    In fact, valence bond theory gives an exceedingly accurate description of H2O:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-1280(88)80277-X [Broken]
    I don't think that Baader is a bad teacher. It is more the other way round: Most introductory chemistry text try to give a "one fits it all" description of chemical bonding in terms of hybrids which is often not physically correct.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Does oxygen in water have an sp3 orbital structure?
Loading...