Does Pipe Diameter Affect Water Flow in a Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
In a water circuit, larger pipe diameters reduce resistance, allowing for greater flow rates compared to smaller pipes. When comparing two parallel pipes of different diameters, the flow rates through each pipe will differ due to their varying resistances. Despite the larger pipe allowing more water to flow, the potential energy drop per unit mass or volume remains the same for both pipes, as they share identical pressure conditions at the fork and pump ends. Therefore, while the volume of water flowing through the larger pipe is greater, the energy dynamics are consistent across both pipes. Understanding these principles is crucial for optimizing water flow in hydraulic systems.
JasonBourneV
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey guys:

Consider the following water circuit: water is continually pumped to high pressure by a pump, and then funnelled into a pipe that has lower pressure at its far end (else the water would not flow through the pipe) and back to the pump. Two such circuits are identical, except for one difference: the pipes in one circuit have a larger diameter than the pipes in the other circuit. Through which circuit is the flow of water greater?


I thought the larger pipe had a greater flow because of its larger volume. Is thhat true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have moved this to the homework help forum.

Your answer is correct -- a larger pipe presents a smaller resistance. The pump, which is capable of producing some specific pressure differential, will move more current in a loop with lower resistance.

- Warren
 
Thanks a lot.
Now consider a variant on the circuit. The water is pumped to high pressure, but the water then faces a fork in the pipe. Two pipes lead back to the pump: large pipe L and small pipe S. Since the water can flow through either pipe, the pipes are said to be in parallel.
What can you say about the drop in potential energy (per unit mass or volume) of water traveling through either pipe?

I thought the drop was the same, because the flow rate through each of these pipes is the same. So, my thinking is that the same volumes of water exit each pipe per unit time.
Thus, the drop in PE must be the same. I don't know if my answer is correct, but my explanation seems to be reasonable. What's your opnion, chroot?
 
The flow through the two pipes would not be the same; they present different resistances.

- Warren
 
Okay, so flow through the larger pipe is faster. That means greatest drop in potential energy?
 
I didn't say the flow was faster in velocity; I said the current was larger in volume.

Consider a tiny drop of water moving through either pipe. Does it have any "knowledge" of which pipe it's in? Both pipes have the same pressure at the fork end, and the same pressure at the pump end. If a water drop goes from a region of high pressure to a region of low pressure, it must gain the same amount of energy, regardless of what pipe it's in.

- Warren
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top