Does plucking one point on the string really can cause standing wave?

AI Thread Summary
Plucking a string at a single point creates two traveling waves that move in opposite directions, leading to the formation of standing waves on either side of the pluck. However, this results in a unique pattern that differs from typical standing waves, as the center point does not remain stationary throughout the wave cycle. The discussion highlights the presence of multiple harmonics, which complicates the wave behavior and phase relationships. Observations indicate that after the waves reflect and meet at the center, the nodes and antinodes may shift, resulting in a mix of standing and traveling wave characteristics. This phenomenon reveals the complexity of wave interactions when a string is plucked at various points.
Jackson Lee
Messages
77
Reaction score
1
I was teaching myself standing wave's chapter. It is said in the book that when plucking in the center of the string, it will cause two traveling waves of different directions, one left, one right. Then both of them will reach ends of string and invert back. Before they encounter at the center, they will form standing waves at left part and right part. However, if we combine them into a complete image, it is different from normal standing wave pattern. What's more, it seems that the problem will continue because it is just like a cycle, the left part and right part always appear to be symmetrical instead like normal standing wave. (I have attached a detailed process from 0-2T.) Anyone could help me?
 

Attachments

  • 20140830467.jpg
    20140830467.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 530
Physics news on Phys.org
In your diagrams, because the center point where you pluck the string doesn't seem to move. If you try the experiment with a real string, or an elastic band, that isn't correct.

This is an animation of a string that you can "pluck" at any point along the length by clicking the mouse.
http://www.falstad.com/loadedstring/
 
AlephZero said:
In your diagrams, because the center point where you pluck the string doesn't seem to move. If you try the experiment with a real string, or an elastic band, that isn't correct.

This is an animation of a string that you can "pluck" at any point along the length by clicking the mouse.
http://www.falstad.com/loadedstring/

The center point remaining constant is because I only chose some specific time point, such as T/2,T,3T/2 and 2T. At that time, the center point has returned to zero, however it has moved within these points(or there won't be any traveling waves). In addition to this, when plucking one point on the string, there are many harmonics, I selected fourth harmonics as an example. If I chose the fundamental frequency, it will wiggle up and down as the string in animation. But the problem is at phase, if we try to wiggle one point, two traveling waves must be out of phase. Therefore, two corresponding reflected waves will be out of phase too. I think this lead to strange effect compared with normal standing wave pattern
 
This looks very interesting.. just take a look.. maybe what u have been thikning about

Its a combination of a lot of harmonics together..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
maheshshenoy said:
This looks very interesting.. just take a look.. maybe what u have been thikning about




Its a combination of a lot of harmonics together..

I have seen that animation, it is fantastic. Thanks. But I don't know its relation with my question. I found another animation here.
http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/Demos/SWR/SWR.html.
Pay you attention to the two standing waves. The first one is formed by two waves out of phase. The second one is formed by two in phase. And we can find the nodes and antinodes of these two are different. It is that what I want to say, after the two reflected waves encounter at the center point, it seems that antinodes and nodes of standing waves might change.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INqfM1kdfUc&list=PLE35BD0AB93E47FB6
What's more, I noticed that it is only part of string have standing wave pattern, and the rest of them are traveling wave. And some of them could transfer between standing wave and traveling wave. I feel really shocked by these.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top