Does plywood follow hooke's law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amy54
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Plywood does follow Hooke's Law, but not in the simple 1-D linear form commonly referenced. Its behavior is influenced by its layered structure, which can lead to complex interactions between longitudinal and transverse properties. The Young's modulus for plywood is not constant across the beam due to its anisotropic nature. While most materials exhibit linear elasticity under small deflections, plywood's response is more nuanced and requires consideration of multiple variables. Understanding these factors is essential for predicting plywood's deflection under load.
Amy54
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
does plywood follow hooke's law? is the young's modulus for plywood constant across the beam? :) and if u have any other hints with deam deflection I am willing to have them :P
thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most things follow Hooke's law for small enough deflections - it depends how far you need to push it!
I would have thought that if there were enough layers of lamination then the longtitudanal/transverse ones would cancel out to give a uniform sort of behaviour.
 
As a caveat to what MGB wrote: Most materials will follow Hooke's Law. However, the form of the law that it follows may not be what you are thinking of. The most generally quoted form of Hooke's is for 1-D, linear, isotropic, homogeneous materials, i.e. \sigma =\epsilon E.

Hooke's law in its most general form contains 81 variables that can accommodate pretty much any material characteristic in all three dimensions. So to answer your question, does plywood follow Hooke's Law...yes it does. Does it follow the 1-D description that everyone knows? No. It does not.
 
But if you just want to know if an 8x4 sheet of ply will bend if you stand in the middle it should be enough.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top